Almost half of Millennial practicing Christians strongly agree that “it is wrong to share one’s personal beliefs with someone of a different faith in hopes that they will one day share the same faith.” (RE, 10) If that is not sufficiently mystifying to a traditional Christian understanding of evangelism as a proclamation of the good news of Jesus to a lost world, then consider this. Only 20% of non-Christians strongly agree with that claim. In fairness, Barna also reveals that most Millennial practicing Christians think that being a witness for Christ is important. But aside from mere “lifestyle evangelism,” Millennial practicing Christians are more opposed to traditional evangelism efforts than non-Christians are in receiving such efforts.
Perhaps not so shocking since beliefs are generally followed by behavior is that less than half of practicing Christians have had three or more conversations about faith with a non-Christian in the last year (RE, 11). Other factors may contribute to this, but the bottom line is that traditional conversational evangelism isn’t happening much. If it were, then people would quickly recognize the need for apologetics. Evangelism can hardly be done today without at least having apologetics in one’s toolbox. This is not our grandmother’s America anymore. We can no longer take for granted assumptions about our culture’s beliefs like God’s existence, a Judeo-Christian ethic, or that the Bible is historically reliable much less that it is God’s word. This is especially evident if one is actively engaging on university campuses.
It hardly matters if people aren’t attempting to do evangelism. People don’t do apologetics, because they don’t do evangelism. One might think that if Christian leaders simply led their people to do evangelism, the masses would see the need for apologetics. Yet, part of the reason for aversion to evangelism seems to be that proclaiming the Gospel is somehow wrong, bad, or offensive. Yet the very word “gospel” in Greek (euangelion) means good news. Confusing good with bad is clearly problematic. According to traditional Christianity, declaring the Gospel is both right and good. It’s part of the term, Great Commission. But it gets worse. According to Barna, 51% of church goers aren’t even familiar with that term anymore. Clearly, our church leadership has some explaining to do.
Finally, what’s sad is that even Barna doesn’t seem to get it. After noting the 44% desire by non-Christians interested in a presentation with a credible, reasonable faith, Barna shockingly claims:
This does not necessarily mean Christians should invest heavily in traditional apologetics, however. As demonstrated by non-Christians’ distaste for street preaching and tracts, depersonalized outreach that feels intrusive or manipulative is likely to lower openness to the gospel… (RE, 55)
Strangely, apologetics commanded in Scripture is somehow equated with manipulative street preaching.
To offer a more positive version of “evidence,” Barna points to an interview in the same Report with a black female pastor at a church in Portland, Oregon who says,
‘evidence’ does not automatically mean ‘proof’ or something visible to draw a person to the sensibleness of a belief. In my experience, the concept of God/Christ/Spirit as Creator is one of the most compelling ways to engage friends and neighbors, to draw their attention to faith. An understanding of how creation cares for us as we care for it shows the value of humanity to a ‘Supreme Being.’ This is evidence. (RE, 28)
Apologetics is viewed as obnoxious by our own pollsters and “evidence” is anecdotally endorsed as something akin to panentheism where the Creator is conflated in some respect with creation. Accordingly, God isn’t merely a Supreme Being. God is also identified with the creation itself caring for us. Barna apparently rejects traditional apologetics as reducible to depersonalized street preaching in favor of the sort of new age thinking that adorns the pacific northwest.
Apologists clearly need to up their PR game in communicating to the church what apologetics is and what it is not. To the extent that apologists come across as obnoxious doesn’t bode well. Apologists must not only continue doing apologetics-evangelism in a winsome way because it is a command that is in demand, but they must also develop an apologetic for apologetics-evangelism. Knowing and correctly understanding the data is a good start. Contact Ratio Christi to speak at your church or to join in apologetics-evangelism on a nearby campus.
 Barna specializes in studying the religious beliefs and behavior of Americans (including the intersection of faith and culture). Unless otherwise noted, most of the stats in this blog are derived from Barna’s 2019 Report: “Reviving Evangelism: Current Realities That Demand a New Vision for Sharing Faith.”